Incorrectly Political: Why MSNBC? Your True Colors?

Incorrectly Political: Why MSNBC? Your True Colors?

Why MSNBC? Your True Colors?

So, I love CNN but I am partial to MSNBC's programs. Morning Joe, The Rachael Maddow Show, Hardball with Chris Matthews, Count Down with Kieth Olbermann and even Live with Carlos Watson are some of the programs I've come to know and love. I came to know many MSNBC personalities during last year's campaign season. But I've noticed a "trend" that is quite disturbing.

Weeks leading up to Dylan Ratigan's show (Morning Meeting) he was a regular on the network's a.m. staple Morning Joe promoting his new show. I started noticing new TV ads promoting MSNBC's new morning line up. They go something like this, "watch MSNBC all morning starting with Morning Joe and after that it's Morning Meeting with Dylan Ratigan and then it's Dr. Nancy, blah, blah, blah..." but absolutely NO mention of Live with Carlos Watson. I've seen MSNBC ads for every show from The Ed show to Andrea Mitchell's. There is not a Carlos Watson TV spot. I didn't even know he had a show until I lucked up on it by happenstance. I actually thought it may have been canceled with the addition of Morning Meeting, because the TV ads actually say, "watch Morning Meeting and then watch Dr. Nancy..." as if there is not Carlos Watson in between.

Why? Even the openly gay white Rachael Maddow (whom I adore) get's many kudos and promos. What gives MSNBC? I went to Carlos Watson's Wikipedia page and was impressed with what this guy has been a part of and has accomplished. He's the real deal!

I'm not calling MSNBC a "racist" network (we all know that FOX News works too hard to retain that title), but I am saying that the executives at MSNBC should be aware of how it looks when the only person of color to host an entire hour on it's network is the ONLY person that consistently gets NO promotion. When we know better we do better...& now you know.

I'm Thed Weller and I approve this message.

BET Awards/MJ Tribute...I call Bullsh*t!

I must admit, as a general rule, award shows don't do it for me any more. I used to get excited about the AMA's or the VMA or even the BET Awards but the truth is, in the era of youtube, seeing your favorite artist perform isn't the rarity it once was but seeing your favorite artist on an award show IS a rarity now-a-days. This year was the exception. Because of the loss of Michael Jackson, and the fact that BET announced that this year's award show would change gears and be a "tribute" to MJ, I made sure I made it home in time to tune in to the 2009 edition of BET's Award show. If you watched it, you probably already know where this is going...if you didn't, allow me to hold your hand while we stroll down memory lane.

First of all, let's talk about "the red carpet". How does CNN have better coverage of BET's red carpet than BET? I'm watching Pleasure P [of Pretty Ricky fame] tell me how he'd love to be some woman's sloppy seconds while Don Lemon is interviewing Pappa Joe Jackson! WTF?!?!?!? This was my hint that maybe the producers and executives at Viacom's "black sheep" my not have placed the proper importance on what could have been considered important to Michael Jackson fans...but let's see how deep the Rabbit hole goes.

What a great start! The complete group New Edition with Bobby Brown & Johnny Gill is on stage doing what they do best! I'm dancing, singing and am so looking forward to the rest of the show!

Jamie Foxx is a true talent. Let me say that. He comes out in every "young" MJ outfit he can find starting with Beat It! Hilarious! The 30 foot moon walk attempt...classic tv. From this point, there were some really good parts & some definite highlights...but I'm not hear to talk about the the "good" stuff....

I love Soulja BoyTell'em...for what he's accomplished and not so much for his music (even though it can be quite catchy *slight admission*), but just because you got on a MJ t-shirt don't make it a tribute performance. I KNOW this kid can dance...we've seen him "superman ho's" all over the nation! I would have really enjoyed watching Soulja Boy with any one of those Jamie Foxx outfits on and dancing to Billie Jean or something. Have some fun with it and pay homage to the greatest...but alas...he turn't his swag on and off and jumped on the bed he had rolled out on stage. This would have been an over-lookable offense but this was the top of a steep hill of "wtf moments" we were beginning to roll down.

Beyonce did good to me. She sang Opera. She was graceful, she was beautiful but she didn't change one thing she had planned to do in honor of the man that was being "honored". She did thank him when she picked up her award but her performance...well, it was all Beyonce and no MJ. I ain't mad at her but she's like the biggest female star in music right now...it would have meant a lot to her fans and maybe more importantly the the hurt family that made it out, to see someone of her stature, do something special in Michael's honor...but maybe it's just me.

So now it's time for Jamie Foxx's performance featureing T-Pain. Like, when T-Pain was in the jewelery store did he just pick this necklace charm out or did he have it made...hmmmm, I wonder. "Big ASS Chain"...WTF was he thinking? How coon-a-licious of you. People who don't "normally" watch award shows, partially because of sh!+ like this, will be sure to continue to watch now! How impressive! A rapper using autotune with a "Big ASS Chain" on...how can I be down?

Jay Z was good, the O'Jays were great, Keisha Cole and Monica looked and sounded nice, Trey Songz was too timid, Johnny Gill over sang (as usual), Tyrese represented and Don Cornelius got really old when we weren't looking. And who ever's job it was to control the "5 second delay" fell asleep at the switch...all night. Maxwell had on a really nice suit and made the ladies swoon and Jamie "moist"and then... the Drake, Lil Wayne & friends performance complete with really young "women" surrounding the ACL-less Canadian. Note to performers..."just because you toss in a "give it up for mike" in the middle of a misogynistic, vulgar, offensive, egotistical, self-promoting song don't make it a tribute to Michael Jackson!"

I was on twitter and facebook the entire show and was glad to see that I wasn't alone in my feelings. Last week I heard a friend of mine say the revolution is being "cell-o-vised" [i.e. cellphones with social networking]. I hope that it is and that we can influence the powers that be (major media conglomerates) to get better or die. Let's not let this be THE only major tribute from our people, by our people distributed by Viacom...

I'm Thed Weller and I approve this message.

To Cell, or not to Cell?

So, my son is nine now.  He's getting to the age where he wants more and more to talk on the phone.  I'm a modern man in that I currently don't have a land line.  So, I am faced with two choices.  Should I... a.) get a land line and let that be the primary phone my son uses or... b.) get him a cell phone.  To me, this question had an obvious answer...a.), right?  I then began searching my options on re-joining the ranks of the "connected talkers".  I used to have Vonage for a period of time.  The price was great but the service left much to be desired.  There was much "re-booting", reconnecting and when the cable was out, so was the phone.  I don't know about ya'll, but when my TV is "unwatchable", I'm usually trying to talk to somebody about why my TV/internet is out.  I then called "Ma-Bell" (AT&T).  Plain and simple, for what you get and how much it would be used, they are too expensive.  I'm currently a Sprint customer and I gave up counting minutes when they came out with the $99 unlimited everything.  I saw that Boost Mobile has a $50 unlimited pre-paid plan and some "pay as you go" $1 a day plan.  This got me to thinking...it would be cheaper to get my son a mobile phone.  Then, I thought, what a minute...my son is on the internet all the time.  He's got WiFi on both his Nintendo DS and Wii now and us them to get online.  When I was at the inauguration this year, we stayed in touch via "G-Talk" and email.  I'm getting him his own computer this summer...a kid that can handle all this "technology" can't handle a mobile phone?  I had to "re-think" my response to the question.

I now believe that I could impose "land line rules" to his mobile phone usage...couldn't I?  Do I really want my son to be going off to middle or high school and just be learning the art of "texting"?  I don't think so.  I then thought back to when "beepers" were all the rage.  I can remember the "powers that be" at that time would say things like, "if you're not a doctor, you don't need a beeper.  You look like a drug dealer."  Of course, this wasn't true at all.  At that time, beepers were becoming "the" way for people to keep in touch.  I was starting to sound like an out dated, antiquated parent who wasn't parenting out of reason but out of "how I was raised" or what I don't think a 9 year old "should" have.

Mobile phones are tools.  As long as I monitor my son's usage and impose some reasonable limitaions, it's my belief that it won't be the end of the world when he's texting me from my mom's house next time he spends the night...

I'm Thed Weller and I approve this message.